![]() It would be the end of Georgetown as we know it.” Charles H. One unnamed merchant interviewed said, “The whole charm of this place is that there aren’t great surges of people, the way you have in New York, along Fifth Avenue… Maybe it looks like I’m against progress, but it wouldn’t be progress. Hinton wasn’t the only Georgetown resident quoted in the article. Historic buildings along Wisconsin Ave., NW in Georgetown, 2010 (Photo: Library of Congress) ![]() If you want to keep it, you’ve got to do something to keep it… What it means is… leave us the hell alone.” In 1977, the Post interviewed her and referenced a position paper from the Citizens Association of Georgetown which argued that a Metro stop would “lead to nowhere but deficits.” Commenting on the position paper, Hinton said, “You come to a point in your life when you’ve got something. A Georgetown resident since 1932 and a historic preservation activist, Hinton had long been known for opposing development and commercialization, and promoting the “status quo” of the upscale Georgetown she called home. – and a single woman who came to represent the mythology. The historians who have tried and failed to bust this myth for good and the journalists who originally proliferated the myth tend to have one thing in common: they trace the Georgetown Metro myth back to a single Washington Post article from 1977 But is it true? The answer is complicated. Sound familiar? This oft-repeated story has become a tightly-woven thread in the tapestry of DC’s history and culture. There is no Metro stop in Georgetown because residents in the 1960s protested Metro out of fear that it would bring “riff-raff” (read: criminals, the poor, and people of color) into the neighborhood.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |